The project

Research links and resources

A route to original publications, institutional records and public learning resources.

Begin with the question

A useful research link should help you check a claim rather than merely repeat it. For the current interpretation of the project’s educational legacy, start with the 2026 article on archaeobotanical storytelling. For the end of the field programme and the expanded chronology, read the 2023 project review alongside the 2022 excavation report.

These documents answer different questions. The final excavation and the final study season did not occur in the same year. Older descriptions of annual summer digging should therefore be read as historical statements. The research timeline keeps those stages separate.

Follow the scientific evidence

Explore and learn

The Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism hosts an official Boncuklu virtual tour. Treat it as an introduction to the place rather than a live display of current visitor conditions. Our education page links the project’s bilingual learning resources with activities that can be completed away from the archaeological site.

Use institutional records carefully

The Liverpool REF2021 case study documents research impact during a specified historical period. It is valuable for community and museum partnerships, but its visitor counts and future museum plans are not current service information. For personal research enquiries use public university contacts; for visit arrangements consult the relevant museum administration. Our reading guide explains how to compare abstracts, full articles and accessible summaries.

Keep a small source record

When you save a link, record the author, title, publication year and the specific question it helps answer. Add a short note about whether you read the complete article or only an abstract. If you later use a figure, record its own credit and licence as well. This simple practice prevents a general source list from becoming an untraceable collection of claims. It also helps distinguish an old project notice from a recent interpretation, or a comparison with another site from a finding actually made at Boncuklu. For a school assignment, a few clearly matched sources are more useful than a long list that cannot be connected to particular statements. Return to the original record when a summary appears to make a stronger claim than the article itself.

Sources and further reading

  1. Archaeobotanical storytelling in a landscape of the mind
  2. The Boncuklu project — Heritage Türkiye 2023
  3. Boncuklu and Pınarbaşı — Heritage Turkey 2022
  4. Heritage of the first farmers — Liverpool REF2021
  5. Agricultural origins on the Anatolian plateau
  6. Boncuklu Höyük: The earliest ceramics on the Anatolian plateau
  7. The animate house
  8. Late Pleistocene human genome suggests a local origin for the first farmers of central Anatolia
  9. Mobility and kinship in the world’s first village societies
  10. Konya Boncuklu Höyük — T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı

Source review: 15 October 2026. Historical observations and current interpretations are distinguished in the text.